4 posts tagged “social worker”
http://www.pro-selaw.org/pro-selaw/index.asp
This
website is designed as a resource center on self-representation in
civil legal matters. Our purpose is to provide a collection of
materials and resources that can be used to create legal service
delivery systems that are based on the concept of "pro se" or "self"
representation within federally funded legal services programs, courts,
pro bono programs, and other community-based programs.
Pro Se means "on one's own behalf." A 1991 American Bar Association study of self-represented litigants showed:
- Persons with incomes less than $50,000 are more likely to represent themselves.
- About 20% of self-represented litigants report they can afford an attorney but do not want one.
- Self-represented persons are more likely to be satisfied with the judicial process than those who are represented by attorneys.
- Almost 75% of those who represented themselves in court said they would do it again.
Self-representation,
when combined with the power of modern information technology can be an
important means of providing increased access to the legal system.
This resource center contains:
-
A searchable Directory of Pro Se Programs operated by legal service providers;
-
White papers and research on the research concept;
-
A Discussion space where organizations that want to design and operate pro se assistance programs can post questions and receive answers from other
professionals who are engaged in operating pro se programs.
www.stopfamilyviolence.org/349
by Sarah Childress
Published on September 25, 2006 by Newsweek
Why Parents Who Batter Win Custody
by Sarah Childress
It took
six years for Genia Shockome to gather the courage to leave her
husband, Tim. He pushed her, kicked her and insulted her almost from
the moment they married in 1994, she says. She tried to start over with
their children when the family moved from Texas to Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
It didn't last long. Tim called her constantly at work and, after they
split up, pounded on her door and screamed obscenities, she alleged in
a complaint filed in 2001. Tim was charged with harassment. As part of
a plea deal, Tim agreed to a stay-away order—but denies ever abusing
her or the children. In custody hearings over the past six years, Tim
has insisted that he's been a good father, and argued that Genia's
allegations poisoned their children against him. The judge sided with
Tim. This summer he was granted full custody of the kids, now 11 and 9.
Genia was barred from contacting them.
Genia is
one of many parents nationwide who have lost custody due to a
controversial concept known as parental alienation. Under the theory,
children fear or reject one parent because they have been corrupted or
coached to lie by the other. Parental alienation is now the leading
defense for parents accused of abuse in custody cases, according to
domestic-violence advocates. And it's working. The few current studies
done on the subject consider only small samples. But according to one
2004 survey in Massachusetts by Harvard's Jay Silverman, 54 percent of
custody cases involving documented spousal abuse were decided in favor
of the alleged batterers. Parental alienation was used as an argument
in nearly every case.
This
year the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges denounced
the theory as "junk science," and at least four states have passed
legislation to curtail its use in custody cases involving allegations
of domestic violence. "It's really been a cancer in the family courts,"
says Richard Ducote, an attorney in Pittsburgh who has represented
abuse victims in custody cases for 22 years. "It's made it really
difficult for parents to protect their kids. If you ask for protection,
you're deemed a vindictive, alienating parent."
It may
seem hard to fathom how a judge could award custody to a parent accused
of abuse. But battered spouses often don't file criminal charges—so no
judicial finding is made against their mates—and family-court judges
typically aren't trained to referee the complexities of abusive
relationships. (Although men are sometimes battered by their wives,
women are the victims in the majority of abuse cases.) Judges often
throw out documented evidence of spousal abuse, arguing that it is
irrelevant in a custody case. And experts say that family-court judges
often look favorably on the alleged abuser because he seems more
willing to share custody than the accuser—who is hellbent on keeping
the father away from the child. According to a survey by Geraldine
Stahly, a psychology professor at California State University at San
Bernardino, attorneys will caution battered spouses against reporting
abuse in court so they don't lose their children. (Stahly and other
academics say the parental-alienation argument has more legitimacy in
custody disputes that don't involve charges of abuse.)
Parental-alienation
syndrome was first introduced by child psychiatrist Richard Gardner in
the 1980s. Fathers-rights groups picked up on the idea and began trying
it out in court. These groups condemn abusers. But Dan Hogan, executive
director of Fathers & Families, a nonprofit group that advocates
for joint custody, argues that all too often the accusers lie in order
to win custody of their kids.
There's
a small but growing movement to ban parental alienation in custody
cases, sparked by embattled parents bonding online. They've linked with
lawyers and advocates for battered spouses across the country. At least
four states, including California, have laws protecting parents who
make good-faith abuse allegations. Others may soon follow their lead.
Greg Jacob, an attorney who takes cases for abused parents pro bono, is
drafting legislation to shop to Virginia and Maryland next month.
Meanwhile, parents like Genia keep fighting. "It's so hard, having my
children lost," she says, her voice breaking. "This was my life—my
children."
- American Bar Association's Lawlink
- ABA - Dialogue on Freedom
- The American Judicature Society - A nonpartisan organization of judges, lawyers, and non-legally trained citizens interested in the administration of justice.
- American Law Sources Online
- Courts.net - Indexed List to U.S. Court Sites
- Davidson County District Attorney's Office - website provides enhanced information about the office to victims, witnesses, members of the community, and the media.
- Federal Register
- FindLaw , A Comprehensive Legal Site Search Engine
- Institute for Court Managment (National Center for State Courts)
- Institute for Law and Justice (ILJ)
- National Criminal Justice Resource Center
- JERITT Project - a national clearinghouse for information on continuing judicial branch education
- Judicial Family Institute
- "Kids and the Law" from California Bar Association
- Law and Politics Internet Guide - (Legal resources)
- Lipscomb University Institute for Conflict Management
- Nashville Bar Association Appellate Practice Manual
- Nashville School of Law
- National Center for State Courts - A comprehensive listing of State, International and Federal Courts
- SEARCH -National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics
- State Justice Institute
- CTAS - County Technical Assistance Service, University of Tennessee
(Complete Listings of County Officials)
- TennHelp - A project of the Tennessee Alliance for Legal Services
- Tennessee Association for Child Care
- Tennessee Bar Association - disciplinary process explained
- Tennessee Bench-Bar CLE
- Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility (BPR)
- Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI)
- Tennessee Code Annotated (on Michie site)
- Tennessee County Information (Info from the National Association of Counties )
- Tennessee Commission on Continuing Legal Education and Specialization
- Tennessee Criminal Law Defense Resources
- Tennessee Attorney General Opinions
- Tennessee Board of Law Examiners
- Tennessee General Assembly (For current legislation - choose "Bills" from site's menu.)
- Tennessee Legislature Chaptered Bills
- Tennessee District Attorney Generals' Conference
- Tennessee Lawyers Assistance Program
- The Tennessee Lawyers Association for Women (TLAW)
- Tennessee Office of Criminal Justice
- Tennessee State Agency Rules and Regulations (Non-judicial)
- Tennessee Supreme Court Historical Society
- U.S. District Court - Middle Division
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Opinions)
- United State Sentencing Commission
- U.S. Supreme Court
- University of Memphis School of Law
- University of Tennesse College of Law
- University of Missouri - Kansas City - Famous Trials - Detailed Historical Accounts
- Vanderbilt University Law School
- Villanova School of Law
Welcome to DemocratChat.Net!!!
Dec 22, 01:26PM
Welcome to DemocratChat.Net - the social networking site for the socially responsible! We are happy to have you among us here at DemocratChat.Net (don't forget the .NET!), where we Democrats can discuss, debate and chat about the many issues that are shaping our party, our country and the world. DemocratChat.Net is also a great place to make new friends and to reconnect with old ones. Here's a list of just some of the tools we have available to you now that you've signed up... Chat Rooms: Chat and debate with other users about specific topics of interest in our many different chat rooms. Create & Join Groups: Create or join groups of other DemocratChat.Net users who are involved with the same local and national organizations, candidates, parties or formal/informal groups. Calendar: Add events to your personal calendar or add events to a group calendar. Then send invites to other users. It's a great way to organize and keep track of meetings, rallies, get-togethers and anything else! RSS Feeds: Turn your "My Hub" page into an aggregation of all your favorite news sites, blogs and other sources of info with RSS feeds. Photo & Video Sharing: Post your photos and videos on DemocratChat.Net! You can make them public or keep them private, but it's a great way to share. Search: Search for other Democrats with similar interests or who are located in your area. Email: Send emails to other users from your "My Hub" page. We created DemocratChat.Net to be used as a tool for change and as a way for like-minded people to connect. We hope you enjoy using DemocratChat.Net, and that you use it responsibly. All the best, Vince & Merry BORING/LEGAL/IMPORTANT Info: Please respect others and don't do anything illegal or we will make sure you are persecuted to the full extent of the law. DemocratChat.Net CODE OF CONDUCT: You agree not to post, email, or otherwise make available Content: 1. that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, or is harmful to minors in any way; user will accept full responsibility for doing so 2. that impersonates any person or entity, including, but not limited to, a DemocratChat.Net employee, or falsely states or otherwise misrepresents your affiliation with a person or entity (this provision does not apply to Content that constitutes lawful non-deceptive parody of public figures.); 3.that includes personal or identifying information about another person without that person's explicit consent; 4. that is false, deceptive, misleading, deceitful, misinformative, or constitutes "bait and switch"; 5. that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights of any party, or Content that you do not have a right to make available under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships; 6. that constitutes or contains "affiliate marketing," "link referral code," "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or unsolicited commercial advertisement; 7. that constitutes or contains any form of advertising or solicitation if: posted in areas of the www.DemocratChat.Net sites which are not designated for such purposes; or emailed to www.DemocratChat.Net users who have not indicated in writing that it is ok to contact them about other services, products or commercial interests. 8. that includes links to commercial services or web sites, except as allowed in "services"; 9. That advertises any illegal service or the sale of any items the sale of which is prohibited or restricted by any applicable law, including without limitation items the sale of which is prohibited or regulated by New York law.